Islamophobia, Christophobia and Kafirphobia

In December 2018 the Foreign Office commissioned a report about the scale of persecution of Christians around the world with the intention of producing recommendations for actions by the UK Government. In July 2019, just a couple of days ago in fact, details were released at a press conference held jointly by Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt and the report’s author Philip Mountstephen, Anglican Bishop for Truro. The full report should be published later in the month.

It is indeed welcome news that HMG is moving towards recognising what people like Raymond Ibrahim and Patrick Sookhdeo of the Barnabas Fund have been saying for years but the report is compromised from the start by its reluctance to identify the main cause.

Here are some excerpts, with my comments following:

       “An estimated one-third of the world’s population suffers from religious persecution in some
        form, with 80% of them being Christians.”

Do we know who 80% of the persecutors are? I think we do but the Bishop downplays the issue.

       “Christian persecution has multiple drivers and as such it deserves special attention. More
        specifically it is certainly not limited to Islamic majority contexts. So this review is not a stalking
        horse for the Islamophobic far right, nor does it give the Islamophobic right a stick to beat Islam

No, it is not limited to Islamic contexts but the great majority of the persecution of Christians is carried out in Islamic contexts, by Muslims. This list shows the details (it sometimes takes a couple of attempts to load it). We all know that but it seems that to acknowledge it means being automatically consigned to the “Islamophobic far right”.

The Bishop naturally finds space for a spot of nos quoque self-flagellation.

      “One thinks with shame of the Crusades, the inquisition and the pogroms….”

Those Crusades will be the belated and very limited response to several hundred years of jihad around the Mediterranean, no doubt. If you have not seen this graphic juxtaposition of jihad and the Crusades by Bill Warner, now is the time to do so.

The report recommends that:

       “The UK should be prepared to impose sanctions against perpetrators of FoRB (freedom of
        religion or belief) abuses and should seek a [UN] security council resolution urging all
        governments in the Middle East and North Africa to protect Christians and other persecuted

Fine, something must be done, but it is the following two recommendations which really caught my interest:

       “Foreign Office staff should be given training in religious literacy and belief dynamics.”

What does that mean? You can bet your bottom dollar it won’t mean getting to grips with the two things in Islamic doctrine that really matter, Islamic supremacism and the means to bring it about, jihad. Without understanding those the Foreign Office staff will be as clueless as the clergy, the difference being that the latter are wilfully so.

       “The government should name the phenomenon of Christian discrimination and persecution, and
        undertake work to identify its particular character alongside similar definitions for other

According to the Press Association report this means giving the malice behind the persecution of Christians a name – Christophobia – to bring it into line with Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism.

The problem with this is that the overwhelming source of this malice is not identified so, for all the naive reader of this report will know, the problem is just one of free-floating Christophobia. Moreover, the reservoir of hatred in Islam is not reserved for Christians – they just happen to be on the border of Islamdom in Africa or among Muslims in the Middle East – but for all unbelievers.

Allah is quite open about it in the Koran. He made it very clear that anyone refusing to submit to him can expect unpleasantness in this life followed by extreme unpleasantness in the next. Therefore while Christians adopt and popularise the word Christophobia the rest of us should point out that it is just a subset of KAFIRPHOBIA. Lets spread the word.

*** Update *** Here is the final report.

5 thoughts on “Islamophobia, Christophobia and Kafirphobia

  1. siamesesquirrel

    Hi Ecaw. Can I share a means of communicating this message that may help reach more ppl?

    It’s about going slow, speaking to push up the overton window slightly each time, but within the tolerance of listeners. Imagine trying to teach a kid how to swim. One can throw the kid in, and let him learn that way, but if he doesn’t at once, most of the time he’ll develop phobia and just avoid water in the future, though learning to swim is good for him.

    Similarly while it’s important and necessary to push for this discussion as fast as possible, it’s also important to make surefooted progress. Slower exposure gives listeners time to open their minds to these concerns.

    I’ve found it gives me more leeway and chances to speak concerns, even in a Muslim group setting.

    After all, if the Islamists want to play the patient long game, why can’t we match that?

    I appreciate your humour and your viewpoint. Do keep writing.

    1. ECAW's blog Post author

      Thanks ss. I must admit I had to look up the Overton Window. Are you suggesting that I tone down my rhetoric? I can see that working in face to face contact, in fact Citizen Warrior recommend not overloading people but just leaving a suggestion and letting it germinate. Personally, I find personal contact dispiritingly ineffective. Of all the people I have encouraged to inquire into Islam, not one has done so. Perhaps it’s the way I go about it but I find that people always have more important things to do, even those who accept that Islam presents a mortal threat to Western civilisation.

      As for this blog, I get the impression that no one comes here who isn’t already convinced so I’m only preaching to the converted. In that case I don’t see any point in adjusting the volume. I will just write about what occurs to me in as honest a way as I can.

      All the best.

  2. Philip Smeeton

    What the fuck is kafirphobia? The Left keep inventing such terms that are without meaning.
    -It’s not what you say, it’s the way that you say it!-
    Every; con-man, politician, actor, orator, parent and cheating spouse knows this.
    You can say something patently untrue in such a convincing manner that people will believe you. We have to tell the truth so convincingly that we can achieve change and set things right.
    The Left can operate with untruths, because in addition to believing these mistaken beliefs to be true, they also are masters at morally condemning people and playing the role of victim. They are the parent shaming the child into submission.

  3. iamcurmudgeon

    Interesting aside to the Viking raids for slave taking. That was a major reason for raiding Europe, because the Muslims were willing to pay so much money for white, predominantly female slaves. Not because the Vikings had that much use for slaves.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s