In Britain there are substantial communities of Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus. Isn’t it curious that Islamophobia exists but neither Sikhophobia nor Hinduphobia do? Perhaps this diagram goes some way to explaining the discrepancy:
To attempt to answer the question:
Option 1. Islamophobia
Is it Islamophobia which causes Muslims to commit the atrocities which we have become so used to over the last generation, or do the atrocities cause Islamophobia?
Which came first? As I remember, the word “Islamophobia” was never heard before the atrocities started.
Option 2. Racism
If these behaviours from Muslims are a response to racism on the part of the British people then why do we not see the same from Sikhs or Hindus who have similar pigmentation and ancestry to the Pakistanis who make up the majority of Muslims in Britain?
Option 3. Cultural Racism
These behaviours cannot be the result of cultural racism because there is no such thing. It is a bogus concept but its effects will be very real because it sits at the heart of the equally bogus definition of Islamophobia which has been produced by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Muslims:
“Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of
Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”
Cultural racism is the “type of racism” referred to. See HERE for details.
Even if cultural racism did exist then the same objection as for option 2 would apply; why do we not see the same behaviours from Sikhs and Hindus?
Option 4. Islam
Bombings and death threats
“We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve…” (Koran 3:151).
“…I have been made victorious with terror” (Bukhari 4:52:220).
“Circumcision is obligatory for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (bazr) of the clitoris (not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband)” (Reliance of the Traveller section e.4.3).
“He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad SAW) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), that He may make it (Islam) superior over all religions…” (Koran 48:28).
See HERE for further details.
The more atrocities there are committed by Muslims the more we hear from other Muslims, and duped Kafirs, that Muslims are the real victims.
Why should that be? Consider the Arabic saying “Show a victim’s face and you will take over”. That is how Mohammed gained a foothold and then power in Medina, after all.
The vulnerable girls of Northern England, and elsewhere, sadly suffered the concurrence of three phenomena, the contempt found in Islamic culture for both Kafirs and females, plus the paedophilic example of Mohammed, the “perfect man”.
”…humiliation and wretchedness were stamped upon them and they were visited with wrath from Allah. That was because they disbelieved in Allah’s revelations and slew the prophets wrongfully” (Koran 2:61).
”…The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews” (Sahih Muslim 41:6985 (and part of Hamas’ charter)).
“O believers, take not Jews and Christians as friends; they are friends of each other. Whoso of you makes them his friends is one of them…” (Koran 5:51).
“Muslim communities are not like others in Britain and the country should accept they will never integrate” (Trevor Phillips, former chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission). See HERE for further details.
All things considered, I believe we have found our answer, don’t you?